GEIST:
To cut the story short, the plot of the film,
Runaway Jury revolves around a case that involves a widow, Mrs. Woods who is
filing a case against a gun manufacturer company because her husband was killed
in an office massacre involving an easily-obtained weapon.
It took place mainly in the courtroom, hiring
Mr. Wendell Rohr as her prosecutor and Mr. Durwood Cable as the prosecutor of
the gun manufacturer company. It also followed the behind the scenes of a
trial, where Mr. Rankin Fitch, the evil jury consultant, was standing in front
of computer and television monitors, apparently able to see the secrets of all
the prospective jurors.
But one
juror, Nicholas Easter, who gets on the panel, turned out to be involved in an
arrangement with his girlfriend Marlee, to sell the decision of the jury to the
highest bidder.
Application of Communication Theories:
Runaway
Jury has various communication theories applied in its script. From my
observation, I was able to list down particularly the Interpersonal Deception
Theory, Social Judgment Theory, Agenda- Setting Theory, Social Penetration
Theory, Symbolic Interaction Theory and a little bit of Groupthink Theory.
Now, let me discuss the events within the film
where communication theories were applied.
Social Judgment Theory
On the initial part of the story, Fitch said
something like “Fat women are unsympathetic, tight- fisted”
Fitch instantly evaluated and perceived the
woman’s attitude as unsympathetic and tight- fisted because of her physical
attributes. Ontologically, this theory is deterministic in that an individual’s
behavior can be predicted.
Rooted in judgment theory, which is concerned
with the discrimination and categorization of stimuli, it attempts to explain
how attitudes are expressed, judged, and modified. It defined attitudes as
"the stands the individual upholds and cherishes about objects, issues,
persons, groups, or institutions." The behavior can be in response to
arranged or naturally occurring stimuli. And in society, specifically in
America, they see “fat women” as such.
Another scene that was applied with the Social
Judgment Theory is when Fitch’s assistant tried to determine the nature of the
photo and letter sender wherein she said, “Syntax, handwriting, word choice- a
woman did the note.”
It can also be explained as how an individual
was being categorized; only the subject this time is a group or an institution
of women population.
Another form of Social Judgment Theory was also
present in the movie wherein within the
duration of the trial, Mr. Garland Jankle, the CEO of the Vicksburg Firearms
stated that they will continue the operation as long as the Second Amendment
stands and that it is not the company’s problem how their clients use their
guns and it is the task of the government so they are not to blame. On the
contrary, Mr. Rohr said with conviction that, the company should at least be
liable for the widespread gun violence in order to avoid more senseless cause
of death.
And as we all know the jury came with the
verdict that favors on Mrs. Woods’ argument.
The Social Judgment theory was applied in this
scenario states that you have a statement or message and you accept it or
reject it based on your cognitive map.
You accept or reject a message based on one's own ego-involvement and if
it falls within their latitude of acceptance.
In their case, they found the statements and
reproofs of Mr. Rohr more acceptable than that of Mr. Jankle.
It was also shown that when people receive
messages (verbal or nonverbal) they immediately judge where the message should
be comparing the message with currently held views. And even when at that time,
their law does not give gun companies liabilities on widespread gun violence,
the juries were able to weigh and compare their currently held views with the
prosecutors’ views.
Interpersonal Deception Theory
The film gave the audiences a lot of information
regarding Interpersonal Deception Theory through the action units detected in
prospective jurors and their meanings.
First, there was Mrs. Coleman. “..Shoulder
shrug. She’s evaluating the person asking the question before she ever answers.
I mean she’s telling Rohr exactly what he wants to hear,” Fitch’s assistant
said.
The theory also states that humans are highly
sensitive to body signals. Just like what Interpersonal deception theory is all
about, Fitch’s assistant also attempted to explain the manner in which Mrs.
Coleman’s nonverbal cues were detected.
Fitch replied that Mrs. Coleman doesn’t
necessarily lying when she shrugged her shoulders.
Other scenes that tried to give explanation on
human’s non verbal cues are when the assistant assessed their actions where he
said, “Tone of voice, body language. She’s got an open mind. She’s going to be
fair and sympathetic to Mrs. Wood.”
This assessment is also included in this theory.
People were able to read others because of the concept of Leakage. In
deception, it is manifested most overtly in nonverbal signals. Some studies
indicate over 90% of emotional meaning is communicated non-verbally. Though in
the film, the woman wasn’t trying to deceive anyone, but still her emotions
were able to leak what she actually feels at that particular moment because of
her body signals.
Another scene is when the assistant detected
more action cues. He said, “The way he’s hunched over and his fingers are
interlaced. He’s trying too hard not to be too obvious.” The guy that the
assistant was referring to was trying to conceal something or deceive someone.
When the sender is trying to deceive the
receiver, often, communication is ambivalent: people communicate one thing
verbally and the opposite non-verbally. Leakage refers to communicative
incidents in which nonverbal signals betray the true content of contradictory
verbal messages. Examples of leakage in reality Facial expression are very hard
to read. The use of FACS, or the Facial Action Coding System, is a much more
accurate way to uncover deception. Small facial movements known as
micro-expressions can be detected in this system using AU’s.
And the last scene where meanings were assigned
to detected body language is when Fitch’s team is trying to figure out who is
manipulating the jury. They saw signs where Fitch said, “Loreen Duke, tightens
in on her left hand,” referring on Loreen, squeezing the hand of Nick by her
side to comfort him which also led Fitch’s team to a conclusion that Nick has a
hidden agenda.
Groupthink Theory
There was a part in the film where the jury had
to elect for their head speaker when Frank, a marine veteran, volunteered for
the position because nobody else tried to step up and get the position. Nick
then nominated Mr. Grimes, a blind old man to be the jury’s speaker because he
has knowledge on the law.
Frank tried to denounce him because the old man
has a disability but Nick defended him saying that Mr. Grimes is blind as much
as the law should be.
The majority of the jury finally voted for the
blind man, and when Frank saw it, he half heartedly raised his hand to vote for
the blind man as well.
This scenario perfectly portrays what Groupthink
Theory is all about. The idea is that groupthink is a kind of thinking in which
maintaining group cohesiveness and solidarity is more important than
considering the facts in a realistic manner. Thus groupthink is a result of
cohesiveness in groups.
Groupthink is most likely to occur when certain
preconditions are met, such as when the group is highly cohesive, isolated from
contrary opinions, and ruled by a directive leader who makes his or her wishes
known. Just like what happened in the election, they all voted for Mr. Grimes
because Nick got their sympathies.
Agenda- Setting Theory
As a member of the jury, Nick had his chance to
manipulate the verdict by influencing others. If they win the case, new policy
regarding gun violence will be made. And in the film, he was the one to raise
the agenda on voting for Gun Manufacturer Company to be liable of growing cases
of violence involving guns.
Policymakers have been found to be more
influential than the overall group of news sources because they often better
understand journalists’ needs for reliable and predictable information and
their definition of newsworthiness. The theory also claims that in order for an
issue to attain agenda status, it must be supported by at least some of key
decision makers as they act as guardians of the formal agenda. They also
asserted that certain personages in the media can act as opinion leaders and
bring media coverage to a particular issue.
In the film, when a new policy was made
regarding gun violence issue, a lot of media people focused on the story
because it is the first time that the jury supported a case like that of Mrs.
Woods against a Gun Manufacturer Company, and again just like what Agenda-
Setting Theory is trying to explain, the news media was able to influence the
salience of topics on the public agenda on that part of the film.
Social Penetration Theory
There was a scene in the movie where Mille, the
fat girl was crying because his husband was arrested. Nick tried to console
her. She even disclosed to Nick her feelings about the possibility that her
husband might be jailed for life if she will not vote in favor of the gun
company.
It is showed in that scene that within the short
period of time, the relationship between the jury developed. And in this case,
Mille felt more comfortable in telling Nick her personal problem which is also
highly confidential considering their situation.
It can be related to Social Penetration Theory
because it is believed in this theory that this process occurs primarily
throughself- disclosure and closeness develops if the participants proceed in a
gradual and orderly fashion from superficial to intimate levels of exchange as
a function of both immediate and forecast outcomes.
Also, that only through opening one's self to
the main route to social penetration-self-disclosure-by becoming vulnerable to
another person can a close relationship develop, which is what was exactly
portrayed in that scene.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento