Producer: Orson Welles
Director: Orson Welles
Writer: Herman J. Mankiewicz & Orson Welles
Main cast:
Charles Foster Kane . . . . . Orson Welles
Jedediah Leland . . . . . Joseph Cotten
Susan Alexander . . . . . Dorothy Comingore
Mr. Bernstein . . . . . Everett Sloane
Walter Parks Thatcher . . . . George Coulouris
Emily Norton . . . . . Ruth Warrick
Synopsis:
In 1941, the media industry set another big
agenda all over the world, when Xanadu’s potent figure of the century, Charles
Foster Kane, died inside his immense fortress loaded with his vast collection
of treasures.
Unknown to the public the meaning of “Rosebud,”
the final word that he managed to murmur, while the snow globe in his hand,
which was owned by his second wife, Susan Alexander, slipped from his hand and
broke into pieces.
Curious about Kane's dying word, the newsreel
editor assigns Jerry Thompson, a reporter, to find out what it meant. He
questions Kane's second wife, Susan, his ailing old friend, Jedediah Leland,
the private diary of his boyhood guardian, Walter Parks Thatcher, his rich
associate, Mr. Bernstein and his butler at Xanadu, Raymond, and Kane's story
was shown by flashing back through the eyes of many witnesses.
Through these sources, Thompsons learned about
Kane’s actual life, his plain childhood life spent in Colorado until they
discovered his mother’s inherited property was the world’s third to the largest
gold mine. And at the age of 25, he took control of the newspaper, ‘The New
York Inquirer’ and hired all the best journalists in town.
Thompsons was told of Kane’s exploitation of public opinion for the
dSpanish American War using his dominating newspaper; his first wife Emily
Monroe Norton, a President's niece and
his failure to his attempt of entry to the world of politics by running as
governor of New York State because of his seemingly affair to a singer, Susan
Alexander.
Kane had
his divorce with her first wife and married Susan, who eventually got bored
spending her days inside the huge castle all on her own and decided to leave
him.
Without finding out what really is the meaning
of “Rosebud,” Kane’s last word, he explained what he has learned with the late
man’s life, that Kane was a man who got everything he wanted, and then lost it.
And that Maybe Rosebud was something he couldn't get, or something he lost.
Kane’s
belongings which are considered worthless were burned in a furnace including a
sled, which he owned since he was a child back in Colorado, the time when he
truly felt happiness in his heart and on the sled was carved its name
‘Rosebud.’ This sled explained what rosebud is, but not what rosebud means.
Critic:
A.
Narrative
This controversial film gained a mixture of
appreciation and dismay from the viewers on its initial screenings.
Basing on these primary reactions, I theorized
that it is related to an individual’s expectation on the film, because of the
controversies that arose even before the film was released in theaters. These
controversies pursued the viewers to expect highly on what they are going to
see and what they will soon discover, but unfortunately, that is the blamable
circumstance there is in the narration of “Citizen Kane.”
They pointed out that it fails to provide a
clear picture of the character and motives behind the man, Charles Foster Kane,
about whom the whole thing revolves.
In the contrary, I commend Welles style of
writing the script, including the fact that the character of Kane wasn’t fully
understood, it remained unknown to the viewers whether he is really a villain
and what made him to be like one.
Welles didn’t overfed the viewers with abundance
of imagery which other writers commonly do, and personally I really get bored
with such. Though he clearly gave us an idea on who really is Kane, and how
would he react on different matters. He was even described by the narrators of
the film or the characters who provide us their memories to give us a view of
Kane’s life. And they all implied the same trait of Kane based on their
narrations. That he was once selfish, hard-headed, influential which he took
for granted and a dictator, but at the same time, he craves for trust, love,
happiness and a simple life that he once had back when he was a child.
I took it positively as part of the narration of
the story, because it gave me the chance to participate in the film, in the
sense that I have to make my own conclusion about his character which I think
is really good because it creates connectivity to the audiences, the way it
made me reflect whether to sympathize or not to Kane’s longing for his
‘Rosebud,’ or that little happiness that he had lost from his childhood.
Another creative storytelling technique that is
used in the film is the foreshadowing. First is the snow globe, owned by Susan,
which first appeared in Kane’s dying hand, it was also seen on Susan’s dressing
table the night she and Kane met, then we saw it next when Susan left Kane and
he destroyed her room. Kane is left only with the snow globe which foreshadowed
his lonely death.
There’s also a scene in which Leland was asking
Bernstein about the journalists’ loyalty to Kane because he just stole them
from the rival paper by offering them more money. Leland wondered if that was
enough to make them loyal to Kane. Leland’s doubts foreshadowed his departure
and Susan’s, who both can’t be bought by money, from Kane's life.
Then, ‘Rosebud,’ the sled which name wasn’t
shown when we first saw it at the scene
of young Kane’s abandonment by his mother, but it foreshadows the film's final
scene, when we finally learn the meaning of Kane's last word, that he’s
yearning for the happiness that ‘Rosebud’ brought to him as a child.
B. Stylistics
Citizen Kane, considering the technological
disadvantage of their time, made its own cinematic progress. It introduced Hollywood
to the creative potential of film techniques. It has also made a unique
sequencing of events supported by Flashbacks where Kane’s story unfolds in
overlapping segments whenever each narrator adds their memories of him.
They also used continuity editing for a more
effective story- telling technique, like in a scene where Leland narrated
Kane’s married life with her first wife, Emily Norton. The scenes where a
montage sequence, which collapsed time while the characters changed costume and
make-up between cuts so that the scene following each cut would look as if it
took place in the same location, but at a time long after the previous cut.
Another continuity technique used is when Kane's
guardian hands him his sled, Kane wishes him a "Merry Christmas".
Suddenly the shot shifted to his guardian fifteen years later, and completed
the phrase by saying: "and a Happy New Year". In this case, the
continuity of the soundtrack was used. This technique is called the ‘lightning
mix.’ Other audio techniques is like what I’ve observed that was very much used
throughout the film, the overlapping dialogue, which was considered to be more
realistic than the stage and film tradition of characters not stepping on each
other's sentences.
The movie is also filled with visual effects
like in its establishing scenes, the towers of Xanadu and the doorway of Susan
dissolving into a front-page photo in a rival newspaper where they used fade in
and out for optical effect; the many audiences of candidate Kane addressing a
political rally, the many Kanes reflected through parallel mirrors and the
great shot as the camera rises straight up from Susan's opera debut to the two
men who are unattached with her voice are done using special effects.
For its most significant contribution to
cinematography, Citizen Kane was known for its use of a technique known as deep
focus. Deep focus refers to having everything in the frame, even the
background, in focus at the same time, as opposed to having only the people and
things in the foreground in focus.
An example of scene where they used deep focus
is when Kane’s parents and Mr. Thatcher were discussing about their plans to
Kane’s schooling, while he can be clearly seen outside through an open window
of their house.
One of the effects used is the in- camera effect
which resulted to a scene that looked like it was shot using the deep focus,
when it actually wasn’t. An example is a scene where Kane breaks into Susan’s
room after her suicide attempt. In the background, Kane and another man break
into the room, while simultaneously the medicine bottle and a glass with a
spoon in it are in close up in the foreground. The foreground was shot first,
with the background dark. Another shot was taken where the background was lit,
the foreground darkened, the film rewound, and the scene re-shot with the
background action.
The introduction of pan-focus, the combination
of pan, a camera movement where the camera rotates side-to-side and again the
camera shot, deep- focus, which is when combined, the viewers are enabled to
see an entire panorama at once, with everything clear in the scene.
I also noticed the blocking of Kane and Susan in
a particular scene where the camera was in a high angle while Susan was on the
lower level begging for Kane’s permission to let her stop from her singing
career and Kane back view firmly stood as he rejects her idea. The blocking and
the camera angle were effectively used to express the psychological
relationships between the characters where it clearly showed who is dominating
and the significant trait of Kane of being a dictator.
And last but absolutely not the least, the make-
ups and prosthetics used to each character that had to look old to make the
film appear rather realistic, is one of the most outstanding elements that was
well- kept in the duration of the film. For example, Mr. Kane, from a very
fine- looking gentleman in his early twenties, within the course of time in the
film, achieved the believably looks of a middle aged guy and eventually a
balding aged man.
C.
Film Reel
Given the fact that it was written and produced
decades ago, and it is the first black and white film that I managed to watch
up to the last bit of second not because this is a school requirement but
because I was eventually into it, I am giving “Citizen Kane” the highest score
of 1.
Aside from its innovative styles in the aspect
of cinematography, the very story is also ambitious in trying to get a positive
feedback from the viewers with its realistic approach. Basically, films
especially before are meant to entertain like the short silent films of Charlie
Chaplin, that sort of thing, but Welles took the risk in his debut movie which
revolved on an influential man who happened to be the owner of a widely
distributed broadsheet in New York.
Welles used those facts to establish a conflict
on how Kane, whose only intention at first is to be trusted and be loved by the
people, became selfish and gave bias information to manipulate the mindset of
the people through his orchestrated news articles.
Within the duration of this engaging film, I
grow different feelings for the villain and at the same time the hero of the
story, Mr. Kane. Every character did very well in their penetrating
performances and of, course, the unique approach of the sequencing of events
and the story flow coupled with its noteworthy advancement on cinematography
are all more than just classic.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento